Feb 15

The terms polychronic and monochronic are used to describe how we understand and use time as well as how time affects our attitudes, behaviours and communication. In The Silent Language (1959), Edward T. Hall used the term polychronic to describe the preference for doing several things at once. Conversely, monochronic refers to an individual’s preference to do their activities one by one.

People in monochronic cultures such as the U.S. or Germany prefer promptness, careful planning and rigid commitment to plans. They also tend to be task-oriented whereas people from polychronic cultures are people-oriented. Cultures such as Italy or Brazil are considered to be polychronic since they prefer to have multiple things happening at once. Polychronic cultures tend to prioritise relationships over tasks and do not consider time commitments to be binding.

The table below highlights some of the key differences between monochronic and polychronic preferences.


Monochronic Polychronic
One thing at a time Multiple activities at once
Rigid approach to time Flexible approach to time
Strict agenda No strict agenda
Focus on task Focus on relationship
Completion of job most important Relationships more important than the job
Emphasise promptness Promptness based on relationships


Cross-cultural training will provide you with a more comprehensive understanding of different approaches to time, including your own, and the impact this can have on doing business internationally. Whether intercultural training focuses on one specific culture such as Doing Business in India, or how to be more effective in any global context such as Communicating across Cultures, the concepts monochronic and polychronic are key to improving your ability to build strong relationships with your international colleagues.

While doing business in other countries, you should consider the different perceptions of time people might have. Everyday global business activities such as scheduling meetings, participating in conference calls or planning a project can be affected by attitudes to time.

© Communicaid Group Ltd. 2010

Nov 30

Name: Edward T. Hall

Nationality: US American

Born: May 16, 1914 in Webster Groves, Missouri, USA

Known For: One of the founding fathers of Intercultural Communication

Key Cultural Concepts: space (proxemics), time (chronemics), high context, low context

Key Publications:

  • The Silent Language (1959). New York: Doubleday & Co.
  • The Hidden Dimension (1969). New York: Doubleday & Co
  • Beyond Culture (1976). Anchor Books
  • The Dance of Life: The Other Dimension of Time (1983). New York: Doubleday & Co.
  • Understanding Cultural Differences – Germans, French and Americans (1990). Maine: Intercultural Press

Edward T. Hall, a respected anthropologist and cross-cultural researcher with a PhD from Columbia University, is often recognised as one of the founding fathers of intercultural communication. Hall developed a number of cross-cultural concepts which have become integral to any cross-cultural training discussion about cultural differences. His concepts include proxemics, monochronic and polychronic, and high context and low context.

Hall worked extensively with the military and the U.S. Foreign Service Institute in the 1950s training government personnel to become more effective communicators in cross-cultural interactions. This experience and research helped validate a number of important cultural concepts, all of which anyone doing business with another culture needs to be familiar with.

Many of Hall’s theories are widely used in cross-cultural training programmes such as Doing Business in the Middle East and Living and Working in France to improve understanding of communication styles and how people build relationships in that culture. Cross-cultural training applies each theory to a practical context to help you be more effective in cross-cultural interactions.

© Communicaid Group Ltd. 2009

pixel Cultural Profile: Edward T. Hall
preload preload preload
Allow Cookies?
Powered by Strategic Internet Consulting